July 5 2009 7 pm Geoff Pritchard
(This is a dialogue, we shall have a discussion later).
Conflict
If human beings
always got on well with each other, the world of work would be great. If
everyone agreed with each other at home, there might be fewer divorces. But we
live in the real world; we disagree. We are in competition with other people
for things they and we want, such as money, territory and space, recognition
and approval, status, affection, and ---let’s face it, we like simply having
our own way.
When I was
employed at a University, we had long and stupid power struggles over the
allocation of space and other scarce resources. They wasted a lot of our time.
We argued over everything ---whose subject would dominate the syllabus in
future, what machines to buy next for the labs, and whose research topics were
most worthy of respect.
Even the degree
classes we awarded to students were the result of an hour’s argument. One
meeting I was at nearly came to blows, and one of the people concerned came out
and asked straight away for early retirement.
Forget the
tensions over promotion! There are plenty of other sources of conflict.
Sometimes there
is no obvious cause. It’s just one hundred per cent personal. To put it in a nutshell, we don’t like them,
and they don’t like us.
We resent their
status, their gifts, their luck, their appearance, their politics, their way of
thinking; what they say, the accent they say it in, whatever. And they think
much the same about us. God hasn’t yet got his way with us. We still don’t love
people enough, and the other guys, well, they don’t even try. Or so it seems.
The disagreements
we sometimes have in our congregations matter a lot to us, but the stakes are
not as high as they were long ago with the apostle Paul; the outcome of his
discussions with other leaders, with Peter and Barnabas, was going to decide
the future of the whole worldwide church.
So perhaps it’s a good thing he didn’t try to dodge conflict. Not even
with the Jewish authorities.
See these next two slides. Two of our morning
congregation, John and Dorothy, spend half of every year as members of the
church that meets in this Greek Orthodox building in Paphos.
(Next slide). One
of those pillars is shorter than the rest. It has an inscription saying that
Paul was tied to it and given 39 lashes.
Our conflicts may
not be quite that bad! When we have petty disagreements, it is easy to come to
the conclusion that it’s our fault. And it may be. After all, the Christian
gospel is about God forgiving us our sins. So if God forgives us, how come we
can’t forgive others their less serious offences against us?
In Matthew’s gospel, chapter 18, the parable of the
unmerciful servant tells us that God will forgive us for everything we have
done wrong, and all that we have failed to do in this life, but read the small
print first: it’s only on condition that we forgive all those other people who
have done much smaller things wrong to us.
Suppose we have forgotten that parable, we are still
without excuse, because in the Lord’s prayer, it says “Forgive us our TRESPASSES, AS WE FORGIVE
OTHERS WHO TRESPASS AGAINST US”.
Someone once wrote:-
“There can be no more terrible word in the English
language than the little word “as” in that particular phrase”. Resentment and
grudges do us real harm. As somebody once wrote, harbouring grudges is like
taking rat poison, and then sitting down to wait for the rat to die. Silly
really.
When we do that, they say, (I’ve never actually tried
it), we begin to feel strange inside, while the rat remains fit and healthy.
After all, if everyone were to get their just deserts, we ourselves would be a
whole lot worse off.
But the conflict
we find ourselves in may not be our fault.
Take the case in
the book of Genesis where Joseph, the youngest of many sons, was treated very
favourably by his father, and given a posh coat, while the others probably had
to put up with those dirty brown cloaks you still see in North Africa. It wasn’t his fault. They felt second-rate. The cloak itself
wasn’t the point; they were less loved.
Joseph hadn’t
asked to be treated better than the others.
It wasn’t his fault. He was just the baby of the family, and his father
doted on him.
Gen 37 verse 3 “now
So the elder
brothers dumped him in a pit, intending to kill him, but they eventually
decided to sell him to some passing traders instead. If you don’t know the
details, it’s all in the musical, Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat.
You might think
that sort of thing doesn’t happen today, but favouritism is actually pretty
widespread in family life. I myself was
favourably treated by my father, again like Joseph, because I was the youngest
son, and by the time I was born, he had enough money to send me to a posh school.
Whereas my
brother, older than me, was sent to a technical college and trained run the
family business, which he wasn’t very interested in. We have never got on since
then.
Conflicts with
neighbours are very different of course; they often start with arguments over a
hedge or bonfires or noise or car parking. They sometimes end with shootings or
stabbings. The book of Proverbs has lots of advice about these everyday
problems.
Sometimes we have
conflicts because the other fellow seems to have a screw loose. Very few of us
are completely sane all the time, but sometimes we meet someone who really
needs a doctor. This is illustrated in the conflict between David and Saul. The
Old Testament Saul, not the
Saul was king,
and he used a former shepherd, David, as a musician, because he needed to be
soothed when he was in a black mood.
Saul wasn’t a
weirdo, he knew how to lead people in battle. His problem was really a medical
condition, caused by brain problems, not a character weakness. We all know
people with similar illnesses. They often have very few real friends, and it
can be a terrible life.
Saul found the
music played by David on a harp helped a bit to soothe him when he felt ready
to explode.
Saul made David a
general; but David turned out to be a much more successful general in battle
than Saul. The mob went around shouting, “Saul has killed his thousands, and
David his tens of thousands!” This didn’t exactly help the relationship between
the two men. It must have been easy for King Saul in one of his black moods to
think,
“David is
plotting against me, he is getting the mob on his side; I must kill him, before
he kills me”.
Paranoia
–irrational fear----is one of the big causes of conflict. It leads to people getting their retaliation
in first, that is, crippling their enemy before their enemy gets a chance to do
them harm. It’s what Saddam Hussein used
to do: he killed his enemies, yes, we can understand that, but he killed his
friends as well, in case they ever thought of changing sides.
King Saul would
have understood. Nothing changes where human nature is concerned! That’s why
the Old Testament is still relevant.
On one occasion Saul actually hurled a javelin
at the young musician, while he was still playing, to try to pin him to the
wall. See 1 Samuel 18 v 10, 11.
It must be
difficult enough to play an instrument, without having to look out for lethal
weapons being hurled at you from close range. Our band doesn’t yet have that
problem, but you never know.
David had done nothing
wrong, and he always did his best to reassure Saul that the two were on the
same side. We are told a story about David feeling sufficiently afraid for his
life to leave the palace and flee into the hills, and to take refuge at night
in a cave.
Saul followed him
in hot pursuit, even going into the same cave himself to relieve himself. David
was further inside the cave in the dark, so he had the advantage. He saw an
opportunity to kill the king, without anybody knowing who had done it.
But he spared the
king’s life, and later showed Saul that he had done so, by bringing back a
piece of the king’s garment that he had cut off while in the cave.
It was a brave
attempt to heal the conflict between the two men.
Usually, when
there is a conflict within a congregation, the disagreeing parties don’t
directly confront each other, because they are all publicly committed to loving
their neighbour.
It is beyond most
of us to disagree with someone frequently, and to appear loving at the same
time. So instead of losing our reputation for being nice guys, we just mutter
discreetly among our friends. The problem festers. Whereas Paul did not
hesitate to have it out in the open with Peter, face to face, not on a personal
matter, but about whose teaching was right.
You’ll have the
chance to say which is best soon. But please don’t focus entirely on conflicts
among Christians; there is a whole world out there, we need to live in it.
Any Christian who
has suffered persecution will understand that just being a Christian can put
you in the firing line in a way that wouldn’t apply to most other people,
except perhaps Jews.
Leaving aside
those Christians whose children are beheaded in certain countries, there have
been several well-publicised cases recently of people even in England who have
been suspended from their work by an employer because they have done something
specifically Christian, such as talk to somebody about prayer or heaven, or
worn a simple Christian cross.
Conflict of that
sort can affect someone’s health as well as their wallet. There are people who
are pressing the government to bring in new laws that will make life more
difficult for us.
One last point:
In James 2 v 12-13 the apostle gives a general principle:
“Speak and act as those who are going to be judged by
the law that gives freedom, 13 because judgment without mercy will
be shown to anyone who has not been merciful. Mercy triumphs over judgment!”
On the next slide
is a list of Bible examples of conflict, contributed by the cell group I belong
to.
Now I would like
us to contribute our experiences of conflict, without giving any confidential
details of course, and I hope we will be able to share ways of resolving some
of the awkward disputes of life. Is
conflict always avoidable, or should it be faced, and how?
.